Værdien af at finde en beboelig planet, som befinder sig langt fra Jord 2.0

[BjarneModerator Super Nova]

Different is More: The Value of Finding an Inhabited Planet that is Far From Earth 2.0

The search for an inhabited planet, other than our own, is a driver of planetary exploration in our solar system and beyond. Using information from our own planet to inform search strategies allows for a targeted search. It is, however, worth considering some span in the strategy and in a priori expectation. An inhabited Earth-like planet is one that would be similar to Earth in ways that extend beyond having biota. To facilitate analysis, we introduce a metric that extends from zero, for an inhabited planet that is like Earth in all other regards (i.e., zero differences), toward positive or negative values for planets that differ from Earth. The analysis shows how assessment of life potential in our galaxy changes more significantly if we find an inhabited planet that is less Earth-like (i.e., it quantifies how probability assessments improve with deviations from Earth-likeness). Discovering such planets could also provide a test of the strong form of the Gaia hypothesis – a test that has proved difficult using only the Earth as a laboratory. Lastly, we discuss how an Earth2.0 narrative, that has been presented to the public as a search strategy, comes with nostalgia-laden philosophical baggage that does not best serve exploration.

Forfatterne slutter med at diskutere Jord 2.0 som en nostalgisk søgestrategi med en filosofisk bagage, som ikke tjener udforskningen på en optimal måde. Jeg er helt enig med forfatternes holdning. At indsnævre eftersøgningen til fundet af en Jord 2.0 giver ingen mening, når man ikke en gang er sikker på, hvad man skal forstå ved “liv”.

 

[Forfatter]

Indlæg